Paris stages ‘festival of errors’ to teach French schoolchildren how to think – Guardian

Article publié dans The Guardian du 21 juillet.

  • French schools accused of stifling mental creativity
  • Science workshops boost accidental inventions

Late in the 19th century, while investigating chicken cholera, Louis Pasteur infected some birds with bacteria that he confidently believed would kill them. He was wrong: not only did the chickens survive; they were completely immune. Pasteur had made a mistake. But in doing so he had also found a vaccine.

Fast forward to the 21st century and France, the country that gave the world the father of modern medicine, – as well as some of the greatest scientists and thinkers of history – is no longer quite so ready to see the benefits of getting things wrong, according to a growing number of intellectuals and education specialists.

They claim the French school system is leaving children bereft of creativity, flexibility of thought and – crucially – confidence in their own mental abilities.

In an attempt to counter this culture of « intellectual timorousness », a group of academics from the country’s elite institutions is hosting a festival in Paris this week with a rather unusual mission: its participants are being encouraged to make as many mistakes as possible.

« A large part of the French school system is based on the idée reçue that errors are negative, when in fact it is by this very process of learning … that you make progress, » said Maëlle Lenoir, of the Association Paris Montagne.

« The French system is founded on a strict learning of knowledge, rather than on creativity or innovation. And yet it was Einstein himself who said that ‘the only sure way to avoid making mistakes is to have no new ideas’. »

Observers of the French school system, while praising certain key successes, have repeatedly highlighted the shortcomings of an educational process which is highly « top down » and results-driven, and which, they say, puts far more emphasis on having the right answer than the thought process by which a pupil might explore the question being asked.

« I’m a scientist. I had nothing to do with education. But then my six-year-old boy went to school and his teacher told me, ‘He’s a nice kid, but he asks too many questions,’ » said François Taddei, the author of an education report published last year for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

« This is the problem of the French system, » he added.

« You are supposed to know the right answer. You are not supposed to express your own opinions or ask questions. »

One teacher who has attempted to rebel against the national model is Girolamo Ramunni, a lecturer at the National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts in Paris, a higher education establishment specialising in science and industry.

Ramunni, an Italian who left school himself at the age of 14, says he tries to encourage his students to reject the pressure to always be right by, for example, giving them problems to solve « which could not be solved ».

« At the beginning they don’t want to take risks, » he said. « But after a while you notice that they are becoming more creative.

« Once they’ve accepted that getting things wrong is not the end of the world, yes, they may come up with some crazy ideas, but they will have some good ones too. »

Organisers of the self-declared « festival of errors », which began in the École Normale Supérieure in central Paris and continues until Saturday, hope to demonstrate to young participants the potential wonder of making mistakes through a series of science-based workshops.

Yesterday, Arthur, 12, explained that it was « difficult » to get questions wrong. « You’re ashamed, » he said.

Waiting for him was Isolde Serfaty, a parent who criticised the « competition and pressure to always do better » that French children face.

« They are marked right from primary school, » she said, referring to the marks out of 20 used as measurements of achievement across France.

For Taddei, the problem is just a small part of a wider malaise which is leaving the national education system – which was born out of the revolutionary ideals of equality and fraternity – increasingly ill-equipped to help level out the injustices of modern society.

Many observers feel the present system, which has been largely unchanged for decades, is calculated to serve the interests of the privileged few.

Asked whether even pupils at exclusive lycées such as Paris’s Henri IV were blighted by the fear of making mistakes, Lenoir said: « I would suggest that at Henri IV they are not so scared of making a mistake because they already know they are right. »

The free festival is aimed at fostering scientific enthusiasm in under-18s from socially neglected parts of the Ile de France region around Paris.

Lizzy Davies – The Guardian

4 commentaires

Connectez-vous tweeter connect

Bonjour,

Je partage les conclusions des chercheurs, mais je ne m’identifie pas du tout à cette vision de la France ! J’étais moi-même un petit garçon qui posait beaucoup de questions, on m’appelait « monsieur pourquoi ». Cela a toujours été encouragé, par mes parents comme par mes instits, qui y voyaient une marque de vigueur et de curiosité bienvenue.

La participation a toujours été valorisée en classe. La quasi-totalité de mes profs a toujours préféré un élève qui s’exprime, propose, même à tort, qu’un élève qui ne dit rien.

Quant à la peur de l’échec que génère le système éducatif, je serais plus nuancé.

D’accord, l’élitisme favorise une sorte de posture sociale, dans laquelle certains se sentent supérieurs. Dans ce cadre, l’erreur peut nourrir la peur de l’échec, et, finalement, du déclassement.

J’ai deux objections, quand même :
– en classes préparatoires (scientifiques, du moins), on est nourris à l’échec. On commence, invariablement, par avoir 4, 5. On apprend, justement, que l’erreur n’est pas la fin du monde et qu’elle n’empêche pas de progresser. On distingue l’effort du résultat.

– la formation scientifique permet de laisser place au doute. On parle plus de « démarche scientifique » que de résultat. Quand j’avais fini mon calcul, ma prof de physique ne me disait pas si c’était bon ou pas, elle me demandait « qu’en penses-tu ? ». « Est-ce plausible ? »
En physique, on apprend et on théorise la notion d’incertitude.

Plus la société aura besoin d’innovation, (« économie du savoir »), plus le doute sera valorisé dans la démarche scientifique. Parce que, justement, on ne sait pas où l’on va. On a besoin de nouveautés, de créativité pour aller de l’avant.

Il me semble qu’en sciences politiques, à l’inverse, et telles que je les ai vécues à SciencesPo, l’enseignement est moins tourné vers l’avenir.
Il s’agit de canaliser les forces politiques. On s’inspire des anciens pour traiter les problèmes actuels. On est nécessairement davantage tourné vers la culture que vers le raisonnement pur.

I just added this website to my bookmarks. I can say, I very much enjoy reading through your weblogs. Thank you!

Je trouve le commentaire de Paul vraiment pertinent, et je partage son avis !

Everybody loves that which you people usually are way up way too. Such brilliant perform plus coverage! Maintain this fantastic will work people I had you fellas for you to my own blogroll.

Additional comments powered by BackType